Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics91.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive66.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 3  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150918
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateSep 03 '20 at 09:17
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
70% Good
Memory 76.9
1-Core 99.4
2-Core 185
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 474
52% 409 Pts
64-Core 477
30% 477 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 70%
Great: 87%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.8% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 125
Parallax 105
97% 116 fps
MRender 96.1
Gravity 116
Splatting 92.3
82% 102 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 93 99 97 87 88 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 377
Write 172
Mixed 213
SusWrite 95.2
47% 214 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 77.8
4K Mixed 28.6
110% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 202
166% 243 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 134%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
232GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 384 367 348 365 379 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 433
Write 410
Mixed 386
SusWrite 368
90% 399 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 78.8
4K Mixed 45.9
147% 51.8 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 346
262% 351 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 102%
Great: 133%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
128GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 133 133 130 134 134 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Read 65
Write 69.7
Mixed 52.7
SusWrite 133
59% 80.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 84%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
68GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 129 138 138 138 139 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Read 139
Write 131
Mixed 29
SusWrite 136
79% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD38G16002 0215 CMY16GX3M2A1866C9 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.7% Average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 13.3
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 11.3
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 86.5
46% 86.5 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z97X-Gaming 3 Builds (Compare 3,154 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 3 - $169

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $817
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback