MSI MS-16P1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics7.38% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive82.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 49% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GE63VR 7RE
MotherboardMSI MS-16P1  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170720
Uptime7.1 Days
Run DateAug 22 '20 at 13:47
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 65%
CPU Throttled 49%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
44.7% Average
Memory 65.6
1-Core 43.3
2-Core 68.4
39% 59.1 Pts
4-Core 130
8-Core 220
21% 175 Pts
64-Core 216
13% 216 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 11F7) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4708
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.38% Terrible
Lighting 7.67
Reflection 65.3
Parallax 7.28
6% 26.7 fps
MRender 10.8
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 15.6
10% 11.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.38%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Thnsn5128gpu7 TOSHIBA 128GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 57XA4104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 362 464 532 599 566 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Read 593
Write 390
Mixed 380
SusWrite 491
104% 463 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 31
4K Mixed 15.1
66% 22.1 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 302
200% 242 MB/s
Poor: 91%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 176%
Hitachi HTS541010B7E610 1TB
305GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 78 80 78 83 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 50.5
Write 80.5
Mixed 58
SusWrite 79.4
50% 67.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.3
134% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston MSI24D4S7S8MH-8 029E CMSX8GX4M1A2400C16 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.2% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 21.1
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 12
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16P1 Builds (Compare 432 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16P1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback