Asus P6X58D-E

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	25.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P6X58D-E (all builds)
Memory	7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100525
Uptime	3.7 Days
Run Date	Aug 05 '20 at 17:11
Run Duration	187 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-950-$100 36,389 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	70.8% Very good	Memory 90 1-Core 79.9 2-Core 161 66% 110 Pts	4-Core 282 8-Core 392 42% 337 Pts	64-Core 388 24% 388 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 70.8% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 370-$153 39,178 User benchmarks, average bench 21% MSI(1462 2015) CLim: 1030 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.4.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	25.8% Poor	Lighting 31.1 Reflection 33.2 Parallax 37.1 25% 33.8 fps	MRender 29.5 Gravity 26.2 Splatting 38.8 26% 31.5 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 25.8% Great: 23%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 146GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 108 112 113 97 45 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	54.2% Above average	Read 224 Write 216 Mixed 197 SusWrite 97.1 41% 184 MB/s	4K Read 31.5 4K Write 47 4K Mixed 34.7 117% 37.7 MB/s	DQ Read 40.5 DQ Write 84 DQ Mixed 51 42% 58.5 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 126%
Corsair CSSD-V64GB2 64GB 219 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 59GB free Firmware: 2.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 112 112 113 97 48 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	30.4% Below average	Read 179 Write 118 Mixed 108 SusWrite 98.9 28% 126 MB/s	4K Read 24.1 4K Write 8.2 4K Mixed 11.1 55% 14.5 MB/s	DQ Read 30.9 DQ Write 8.2 DQ Mixed 11.9 11% 17 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 34%
Seagate ST32000641AS 2TB-$89 8,506 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 853GB free Firmware: CC13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 105 104 104 105 104 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	62.5% Good	Read 114 Write 117 Mixed 62 SusWrite 104 73% 99.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 1.1 186% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 73%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 387GB free, PID 2028 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 29 29 29 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	15.7% Very poor	Read 32.5 Write 28.7 Mixed 27 SusWrite 28.9 39% 29.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 55%
Generic Flash Disk 126GB 514 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 28GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 7.2 13 7.5 7.3 7.5 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	4.91% Terrible	Read 16.3 Write 1.2 Mixed 15.8 SusWrite 8.1 13% 10.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 1 46% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.91% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 6 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	34.6% Below average	MC Read 12.4 MC Write 11.6 MC Mixed 10 32% 11.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 9 SC Mixed 10.7 28% 9.7 GB/s	Latency 67.2 60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P6X58D-E Builds (Compare 1,353 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P6X58D-E

CPU
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	498x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	198x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	145x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	74x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	74x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	68x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	47x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	40x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	40x

RAM
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	231x
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	222x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	132x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $289

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16