Asus P8B75-V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8B75-V  (all builds)
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140318
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 31 '20 at 17:20
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1220 V2-$305
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Memory 94.3
1-Core 97.3
2-Core 192
75% 128 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 367
48% 358 Pts
64-Core 368
23% 368 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8600 GT
PNY(196E 0439) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 341.74
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
2.08% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 4.23
Parallax 0.78
2% 2.4 fps
MRender 4.43
Gravity 1.57
Splatting 3.65
3% 3.22 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.08%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 112 73 73 74 74 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 467
Write 312
Mixed 340
SusWrite 105
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 54.8
4K Mixed 28.8
111% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 195
171% 252 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 85%
WDC WD16 00AAJS-00YZCA0 160GB
135GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 27 27 27 26 26 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Read 32.6
Write 25.3
Mixed 24.4
SusWrite 26.9
36% 27.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 029E CMZ8GX3M1A1600C10 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
62.5% Good
MC Read 22.9
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 19.6
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 18.8
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 59
68% 59 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8B75-V Builds (Compare 1,152 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $442
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback