Asus P8B75-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics80.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive40.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8B75-M  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140806
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 13 '20 at 23:43
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 47%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2700K-$89
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
68.1% Good
Memory 87.2
1-Core 86.9
2-Core 166
68% 113 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 385
41% 325 Pts
64-Core 407
25% 407 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.4% Excellent
Lighting 98.1
Reflection 116
Parallax 95.3
80% 103 fps
MRender 100
Gravity 96.9
Splatting 100
81% 99.1 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme Pro 480GB-$199
404GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X21200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 82 95 98 102 101 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.3% Average
Read 206
Write 205
Mixed 145
SusWrite 91.7
36% 162 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 38.2
4K Mixed 21.4
80% 26.9 MB/s
DQ Read 24.9
DQ Write 64.6
DQ Mixed 30.5
27% 40 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 114%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31
371GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 88 96 97 102 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 121
Write 120
Mixed 62.6
SusWrite 93.5
73% 99.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
182% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 109%
WD Gold 4TB (2016)-$99
603GB free
Firmware: 01.01M02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 171 172 167 172 171 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Read 145
Write 157
Mixed 70.6
SusWrite 170
99% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 0.7
217% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
V01D3LF4GB26826813 8634 SUPERTALENT02 8634 SUPERTALENT02 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
47.4% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 15.1
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 15.4
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8B75-M Builds (Compare 1,499 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M - $470

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $900
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback