Acer Aspire E5-575G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	5.82% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Acer Aspire E5-575G (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Ironman_SK
Memory	22.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160426
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jul 08 '20 at 09:28
Run Duration	227 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	100%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6500U 102,213 User benchmarks, average bench 46% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	39.7% Below average	Memory 60.3 1-Core 42.9 2-Core 74.2 38% 59.1 Pts	4-Core 108 8-Core 143 16% 125 Pts	64-Core 156 10% 156 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Acer(1025 1094) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4534 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	5.82% Terrible	Lighting 6.17 Reflection 10.4 Parallax 5.19 5% 7.25 fps	MRender 7.76 Gravity 5.17 Splatting 12.6 7% 8.5 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.82% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013) 72,354 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 49 41 44 66 64 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	39.1% Below average	Read 85.2 Write 81.7 Mixed 42.3 SusWrite 50.9 48% 65 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 106% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 63%
Seagate ST1500LM 006 HN-M151RAD 1.5TB 80 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 107GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 9 8.7 8.7 8.7 9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	11.9% Very poor	Read 32 Write 29.4 Mixed 28.8 SusWrite 8.7 18% 24.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 1 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 65%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 7,128 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 470GB free, PID 0900 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.2 8.2 8.5 8.6 8.4 8.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	10.4% Very poor	Read 28.2 Write 28.4 Mixed 27.7 SusWrite 8.5 31% 23.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.3 60% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 10.4% Great: 52%
WD My Passport 0820 2TB 18,744 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 691GB free, PID 0820 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 8.6 8.5 8.6 8.3 8.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	11% Very poor	Read 30.5 Write 29.7 Mixed 21.5 SusWrite 8.5 29% 22.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 42%
Samsung S2 Portable 500GB 2,689 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 74GB free, PID 1f05 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 7.1 8 8.2 8.1 8.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	9.43% Terrible	Read 23 Write 19 Mixed 23.7 SusWrite 8 24% 18.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 65% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 9.43% Great: 21%
WD Elements 2621 2TB 11,378 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 231GB free, PID 2621 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 8.6 8.4 8.5 8.4 8.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	17.2% Very poor	Read 32.5 Write 32.5 Mixed 23 SusWrite 8.5 31% 24.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 0.7 142% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 17.2% Great: 64%
JetFlash Transcend 32GB 11,405 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 16GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 8.2 22 23 22 22 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 17 Write 22.2 SusWrite 16.6 24% 18.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.7 47% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4SFD8213.M16FA 2x16GB 184 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	54.6% Above average	MC Read 19.4 MC Write 22.4 MC Mixed 20.8 60% 20.9 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 15.4 SC Mixed 10.1 31% 11 GB/s	Latency 127 32% 127 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire E5-575G Builds (Compare 3,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-575G

CPU
Core i5-7200UIntelBench 45%, 205,332 samples	1,723x
Core i5-6200UIntelBench 41%, 135,462 samples	462x
Core i7-7500UIntelBench 48%, 139,101 samples	381x

GPU
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	1,524x
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	600x
GeForce 940MXNvidiaBench 9%, 7,286 samples	580x

SSD
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples	280x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	107x
RBUSNS8280S3128GH2 128GBKingstonBench 49%, 1,212 samples	88x

RAM
ACR24D4S7S8MB-8 1x8GBKingstonBench 36%, 13,568 samples	393x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G3B1 1x8GBMicronBench 36%, 24,227 samples	135x
ACR21D4S15HAG/8G 1x8GBKingstonBench 36%, 2,395 samples	118x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16