Asus M32CD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics44.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus M32CD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M32CD
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150828
Uptime8.8 Days
Run DateJul 03 '20 at 21:52
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 79.3
1-Core 101
2-Core 198
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 394
52% 387 Pts
64-Core 395
24% 395 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
44.9% Average
Lighting 58
Reflection 54.3
Parallax 48.3
47% 53.5 fps
MRender 45
Gravity 51.5
Splatting 49.8
40% 48.8 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU760 256GB
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: XA001R21
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 363 409 416 413 413 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 428
Write 408
Mixed 360
SusWrite 376
88% 393 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 92.8
4K Mixed 49.1
166% 59.2 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 259
196% 260 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 103%
Great: 110%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$27
336GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 142 144 147 146 146 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Read 158
Write 140
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 143
85% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F641GU67G1600G Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
60.5% Good
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 19.2
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 19.5
53% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 81.9
49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M32CD Builds (Compare 294 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus M32CD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $107
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549WD Black SN850X M.2 4TB $293
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback