Megaware MW-H61HD-MA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMegaware MW-H61HD-MA  (all builds)
MotherboardMEGAWARE MW-H61HD-MA
Memory2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121107
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateJun 24 '20 at 14:10
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 87%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3330
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
54.4% Above average
Memory 81.8
1-Core 60.2
2-Core 142
57% 94.7 Pts
4-Core 151
8-Core 202
22% 177 Pts
64-Core 256
16% 256 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Elitegroup(1019 7DAF) 2.5GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5129
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.58% Terrible
Lighting 1.63
Reflection 1.69
Parallax 1.31
1% 1.55 fps
MRender 3.29
Gravity 1.03
Splatting 3.09
2% 2.47 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.58%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar SSD 256GB
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 136 134 139 139 135 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.9% Average
Read 199
Write 203
Mixed 197
SusWrite 147
42% 187 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 40.9
4K Mixed 16.5
79% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 34
62% 124 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 110%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
85GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 72 65 67 69 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 61.3
Write 55.4
Mixed 48.7
SusWrite 68.5
43% 58.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
132% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 68%
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102
58GB free
Firmware: 3.AAK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 37 38 39 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
29.6% Poor
Read 64.7
Write 43.5
Mixed 42.7
SusWrite 38.2
35% 47.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 43%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 2TB
552GB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 13 14 13 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Read 28.1
Write 28.9
Mixed 26.1
SusWrite 13.5
18% 24.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.5
157% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 67%
ASMT 2115 500GB
114GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 32.3
Write 25.1
Mixed 26
SusWrite 12.5
31% 24 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 166%
Hitachi HTS725032A9A364 320GB
212GB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.6% Very poor
Read 32.2
Write 25.9
Mixed 24.1
SusWrite 12.6
30% 23.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 9905458-009.A00LF Kingston 99U5471-028.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
46.6% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 15.1
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 13.3
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MW-H61HD-MA Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Megaware MW-H61HD-MA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback