HP 500-314

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 500-314  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B17
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150310
Uptime11.5 Days
Run DateJun 23 '20 at 10:52
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
48.1% Average
Memory 62.6
1-Core 64.9
2-Core 116
49% 81.1 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 189
26% 193 Pts
64-Core 197
12% 197 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
HP(103C 2B17) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
3.5% Terrible
Lighting 4.07
Reflection 5.23
Parallax 8.53
3% 5.94 fps
MRender 2.71
Gravity 6.93
Splatting 4.48
4% 4.71 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.5%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: MK7OA840
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 102 123 127 129 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
72% Very good
Read 135
Write 139
Mixed 73.2
SusWrite 116
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
167% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 72%
Great: 82%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
813GB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 28 28 30 30 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 28.7
Write 28.3
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 28.6
37% 26.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.4
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD38G16002 Hynix HMT41GU6AFR8A-PB 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.6% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 6.2
19% 6.8 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 6.6
16% 5.77 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 500-314 Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP 500-314

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback