Asrock X299 Professional Gaming i9 XE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 140%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive330% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock X299 Professional Gaming i9 XE  (all builds)
Memory113.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190906
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateJun 17 '20 at 20:06
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7980XE-$993
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Memory 63
1-Core 133
2-Core 265
81% 154 Pts
4-Core 530
8-Core 1,047
93% 789 Pts
64-Core 2,887
179% 2,887 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Nvidia(10DE 12A4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
126% Outstanding
Lighting 166
Reflection 167
Parallax 176
135% 170 fps
MRender 200
Gravity 168
Splatting 115
127% 161 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 126%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
277GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1937 1934 1920 1976 1951 1943 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
330% Outstanding
Read 2,391
Write 2,044
Mixed 1,044
SusWrite 1,944
416% 1,856 MB/s
4K Read 41.5
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 71.2
231% 85.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,127
DQ Write 830
DQ Mixed 1,002
742% 986 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 330%
Great: 393%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
834GB free
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1240 1288 1290 1306 1272 1107 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
255% Outstanding
Read 1,738
Write 1,415
Mixed 723
SusWrite 1,250
286% 1,282 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 57.9
202% 73.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,160
DQ Write 933
DQ Mixed 919
723% 1004 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 255%
Great: 302%
WDC WDS200T2B0B-00YS70 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: X61130WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 418 421 432 442 446 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Read 423
Write 424
Mixed 349
SusWrite 431
92% 407 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 50.6
4K Mixed 33
105% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 231
204% 307 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 119%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 299 291 219 131 121 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
83.2% Excellent
Read 1002
Write 230
Mixed 301
SusWrite 226
96% 440 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 17
4K Mixed 18.6
67% 19.5 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 172
134% 187 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
84.4% Excellent
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 44
MC Mixed 28.4
96% 33.7 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 8.9
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X299 Professional Gaming i9 XE Builds (Compare 70 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X299 Professional Gaming i9 XE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $878
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback