HP Z620 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive52.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z620 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 158A
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 16 '20 at 07:05
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2620 0-$77
CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
60.4% Good
Memory 79.6
1-Core 60.3
2-Core 117
54% 85.8 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 271
33% 253 Pts
64-Core 278
17% 278 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 63%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin Triactor 480GB-$150
306GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 89 62 146 71 72 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.2% Above average
Read 237
Write 239
Mixed 232
SusWrite 87.9
45% 199 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 47.1
4K Mixed 28.6
95% 32.6 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 142
115% 162 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 171 173 175 178 176 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Read 136
Write 162
Mixed 121
SusWrite 173
109% 148 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.8
370% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 90%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 127 127 129 131 125 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
73.3% Very good
Read 128
Write 125
Mixed 109
SusWrite 127
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT31GR7EFR4A-PB 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 15
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 8.7
28% 9.67 GB/s
Latency 81.3
49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z620 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,420 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: HP Z620 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $345
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback