Asus F1A55-M LE

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	28.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus F1A55-M LE (all builds)
Memory	4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110818
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jun 15 '20 at 17:07
Run Duration	180 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-3400 APU-$80 2,796 User benchmarks, average bench 36% FM1 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	32.2% Below average	Memory 51.3 1-Core 40.4 2-Core 77.9 35% 56.5 Pts	4-Core 78.8 8-Core 78.8 11% 78.8 Pts	64-Core 81 5% 81 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% MSI(1462 8C97) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	28.6% Poor	Lighting 34.9 Reflection 26 Parallax 32.7 28% 31.2 fps	MRender 38.4 Gravity 34.1 Splatting 33.9 29% 35.5 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 150 179 182 200 185 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	41.5% Average	Read 197 Write 190 Mixed 180 SusWrite 174 42% 185 MB/s	4K Read 18.4 4K Write 23.9 4K Mixed 20.1 66% 20.8 MB/s	DQ Read 32.5 DQ Write 70.5 DQ Mixed 42.6 35% 48.5 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 98GB free Firmware: KC44 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 82 83 84 84 77 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	51.2% Above average	Read 96.8 Write 95.7 Mixed 41 SusWrite 82 58% 78.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.6 94% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 88%
Seagate M3 Portable 4TB 578 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 127GB free, PID 61b7 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 28 29 29 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	16.2% Very poor	Read 23.3 Write 25 Mixed 22.8 SusWrite 28.2 34% 24.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 95% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.2% Great: 56%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 58GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 30 30 31 30 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	16.2% Very poor	Read 29.5 Write 28.8 Mixed 24.5 SusWrite 29.8 38% 28.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 16.2% Great: 44%
Seagate M3 Portable 4TB 578 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 20GB free, PID 61b7 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 30 31 32 31 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	19.6% Very poor	Read 24.8 Write 26 Mixed 25.3 SusWrite 30.2 37% 26.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 0.5 122% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 19.6% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905403-439.A00LF 8GB 118 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1333, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	25.9% Poor	MC Read 10 MC Write 8.9 MC Mixed 9.3 27% 9.4 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 4.7 SC Mixed 7.5 17% 5.83 GB/s	Latency 156 26% 156 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical F1A55-M LE Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A55-M LE

CPU
A6-3650 APUAMDBench 44%, 2,748 samples	8x
A6-3670 APUAMDBench 46%, 2,400 samples	6x
A8-3850 APUAMD $80Bench 46%, 3,108 samples	6x

GPU
Radeon HD 6530DAMDBench 3%, 4,675 samples	6x
Radeon HD 6410DAMDBench 2%, 3,128 samples	5x
Radeon HD 6550DAMDBench 4%, 4,197 samples	4x

SSD
MTFDDAK256MAY-1AH12ABHA 256GBCrucialBench 83%, 1,792 samples	2x
SSDPR-CL100-240-G2 240GBBench 68%, 1,204 samples	2x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x

RAM
M378B5173BH0-CK0 8GBSamsungBench 43%, 56 samples	2x
KHX1600C9D3/4GX 8GBKingstonBench 41%, 1,116 samples	2x
99U5471-012.A00LF 8GBKingstonBench 47%, 1,159 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16