PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 96.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 70.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-890XA-UD3 (all builds) |
Memory | 7.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20100413 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jun 08 '20 at 13:53 |
Run Duration | 245 Seconds |
Run User | RUS-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
57.6%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.66
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
96.5%
Outstanding
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 66 57 58 60 50 MB/s
|
70.7%
Very good
|
|||
OCZ SOLID3 120GB
6GB free
Firmware: 2.11
|
||||
64gb SSD 64GB
10GB free
Firmware: V3.9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 85 85 87 84 MB/s
|
40.4%
Average
|
|||
WD Elements 25A3 4TB
48GB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 152 144 136 127 145 MB/s
|
62%
Good
|
|||
WD Elements 25A3 4TB
17GB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 84 105 112 106 89 MB/s
|
41.4%
Average
|
|||
WD Elements 25A3 4TB
1GB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
|
||||
WDC WD32 00BEVT-00A0RT0 320GB
2GB free, PID 2336
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 17 15 16 16 16 MB/s
|
11.6%
Very poor
|
|||
WD Elements 1TB
1GB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
|
||||
StoreJet Transcend 640GB
10GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 20 20 20 19 MB/s
|
11.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 12GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 4096, 4096 MB
|
33.5%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples | 13x |
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples | 7x |
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples | 5x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 460Nvidia $203Bench 12%, 31,648 samples | 4x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 4x |
HD 6950AMD $290Bench 19%, 24,657 samples | 3x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 29% - Poor | Total price: $315 |