Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 48% Yacht	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 42% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	47.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	144% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Gigabyte Default string
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4-CF (all builds)
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160428
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 21 '17 at 20:12
Run Duration	201 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	88.3% Excellent	Memory 96.2 1-Core 107 2-Core 226 82% 143 Pts	4-Core 434 8-Core 681 69% 557 Pts	64-Core 808 50% 808 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 88.3% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% AMD(1002 0B37) CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.2.1 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	47.7% Average	Lighting 58.1 Reflection 65.8 Parallax 74.9 47% 66.3 fps	MRender 66.6 Gravity 57.4 Splatting 55.1 48% 59.7 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 431GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4001 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 83 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 55 37 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 6 (F1) Unknown 99 99 350171583	112% Outstanding	Read 513 Write 413 Mixed 419 100% 449 MB/s	4K Read 44.8 4K Write 78.9 4K Mixed 46.1 169% 56.6 MB/s	DQ Read 369 DQ Write 256 DQ Mixed 130 146% 251 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 134%
Kingston SSDNow V300 480GB-$250 15,510 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 365GB free Firmware: 608ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 5119879 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 24077586665852 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 466 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 68 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 32 45 73017393184 (C2) HDA temperature 32 45 73017393184 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 5119879 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 5119879 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 5119879 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 99 99 94489280513 (E9) Unknown 0 0 6950 (EA) Unknown 0 0 2427 (F1) Unknown 0 0 2427 (F2) Unknown 0 0 1372 (F4) Unknown 100 100 1310724	61.3% Good	Read 508 Write 239 Mixed 311 78% 352 MB/s	4K Read 22.2 4K Write 21.5 4K Mixed 19 69% 20.9 MB/s	DQ Read 142 DQ Write 86.5 DQ Mixed 51.2 55% 93.4 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 65%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250 40,327 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 89GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	144% Outstanding	Read 772 Write 630 Mixed 709 157% 704 MB/s	4K Read 46.1 4K Write 114 4K Mixed 48 192% 69.4 MB/s	DQ Read 475 DQ Write 259 DQ Mixed 163 176% 299 MB/s
Poor: 131% ↑ This bench: 144% Great: 243%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 573GB free Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 106 99 11006080 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 720 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 83 60 208330552 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 11690 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 563 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 6 (BD) vendor-specific 98 98 2 (BE) vendor-specific 69 58 522125343 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 64 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 8551 (C2) HDA temperature 31 42 68719476767 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -38727720096728 (F1) Unknown 100 253 12887666165 (F2) Unknown 100 253 45209714176	70.6% Very good	Read 116 Write 131 Mixed 120 92% 122 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 1.72 4K Mixed 0.16 74% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 112%
Samsung HD403LJ 400GB-$183 4,107 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 221GB free Firmware: CT100-10 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 253 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 7680 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4994 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 67843 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1775 (BB) vendor-specific 253 253 0 (BC) Unknown 253 253 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 40 32 (C2) HDA temperature 142 58 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 30343 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 253 0	31% Below average	Read 47.7 Write 60.1 Mixed 58.5 42% 55.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.23 4K Mixed 0.32 76% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown DDR4 3000 4x4GB 115 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	79.7% Very good	MC Read 36 MC Write 21.9 MC Mixed 28.1 82% 28.7 GB/s	SC Read 16.3 SC Write 19.5 SC Mixed 23.8 57% 19.9 GB/s	Latency 53.3 75% 53.3 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 79.7% Great: 105%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X99-UD4-CF Builds (Compare 803 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 47%

Yacht

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4-CF

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	427x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	116x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	58x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	84x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	51x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	49x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	23x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	21x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	21x

RAM
Ballistix Sport DDR4 2400 C16 4x4GBCrucial $84Bench 97%, 1,914 samples	20x
16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A1 2x8GBMicronBench 68%, 1,302 samples	15x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x4GBCorsair $115Bench 88%, 5,380 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $457

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16