Gigabyte GA-P55M-UD2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-P55M-UD2  (all builds)
Memory8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100623
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '17 at 18:08
Run Duration289 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-750-$72
Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
66.8% Good
Memory 90
1-Core 67.3
2-Core 134
60% 97 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 244
34% 250 Pts
64-Core 267
16% 267 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4300
Asus(1043 02A8) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.1% Terrible
Lighting 1.43
Reflection 1.88
Parallax 1.28
1% 1.53 fps
MRender 1.29
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.35
1% 1.14 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.1%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.1% Above average
Read 267
Write 213
Mixed 218
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 55
4K Mixed 21.5
107% 36.6 MB/s
DQ Read 36.5
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 21.7
34% 61.7 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 124%
WDC WD1500ADFD-00NLR 60GB
44GB free
Firmware: .153 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.5% Poor
Read 122
Write 50.8
Mixed 71
18% 81.2 MB/s
4K Read 12.5
4K Write 34.2
4K Mixed 6.73
46% 17.8 MB/s
DQ Read 16.9
DQ Write 42.6
DQ Mixed 7.59
12% 22.4 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 24%
Corsair CMFSSD-64D1 64GB
23GB free
Firmware: 0.1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
17.9% Very poor
Read 135
Write 35.4
Mixed 43.2
15% 71.3 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 2.61
4K Mixed 1.55
38% 9.07 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 33%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$68
954GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 115
Write 93.9
Mixed 82
73% 97 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 0.29
4K Mixed 0.21
51% 0.35 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$68
485GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 98.4
Write 90.2
Mixed 85.3
69% 91.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.73
4K Write 0.37
4K Mixed 0.22
62% 0.44 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 67%
WD WD1500ADFD-00NLR1 150GB
128GB free
Firmware: 020. Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 80.3
Write 83.8
Mixed 65.9
57% 76.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.92
4K Write 1.87
4K Mixed 0.55
134% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 47%
WD WD3000GLFS-01F8U0 300GB
119GB free
Firmware: 03.03V01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 100
Write 108
Mixed 96.5
76% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.89
4K Write 2.94
4K Mixed 0.61
160% 1.48 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12GB
null MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
38.1% Below average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 12.9
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 7.7
23% 8.17 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-P55M-UD2 Builds (Compare 315 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55M-UD2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $231
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback