| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 34% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 31.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Alienware Aurora-R4 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Alienware 07JNH0 |
| Memory | 28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20121026 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 26 '17 at 23:05 |
| Run Duration | 118 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 19% |
PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
43.1%
Average
|
40% 59.5 Pts
|
13% 95.8 Pts
|
8% 126 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GTX 690 (SLI Disabled)
Nvidia(10DE 095B) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.33
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
34%
Below average
|
35% 41.1 fps
|
32% 40.3 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
31.7%
Below average
|
54% 248 MB/s
|
22% 5.22 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378B1G73CB0-CK0 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
50.4%
Above average
|
56% 19.7 GB/s
|
19% 6.67 GB/s
|
40% 101 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Aurora-R4 Builds (Compare 1,693 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Alienware Aurora-R4
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples | 579x |
| Core i7-4820KIntel $110Bench 72%, 23,169 samples | 455x |
| Core i7-3930KIntel $280Bench 74%, 33,172 samples | 234x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 124x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 92x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 92x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 89% - Excellent | Total price: $262 |