Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory29.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 17 '20 at 20:32
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User BLR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Memory 89
1-Core 152
2-Core 302
98% 181 Pts
4-Core 592
8-Core 1,006
97% 799 Pts
64-Core 1,436
89% 1,436 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,702
Write 2596
Mixed 1939
537% 2,412 MB/s
4K Read 71.4
4K Write 189
4K Mixed 101
338% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 518
DQ Write 1,247
DQ Mixed 231
362% 665 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%
Kingdian S280 1TB
152GB free
Firmware: Q1211A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 439 258 140 135 127 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
99% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 430
Mixed 363
SusWrite 254
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 91.3
4K Mixed 52.9
174% 60.7 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 85.1
96% 163 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 99%
Great: 120%
Netac 960GB 960GB
217GB free
Firmware: R0831B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 77 9.7 14 103 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 499
Write 412
Mixed 16.8
SusWrite 105
57% 258 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 8.7
4K Mixed 0.6
39% 10.5 MB/s
DQ Read 85.5
DQ Write 9.5
DQ Mixed 0.7
12% 31.9 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 104%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$100
879GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 106 103 107 106 107 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 154
Write 156
Mixed 108
SusWrite 105
97% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
210% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 100%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$83
521GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 133 132 134 135 134 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
73% Very good
Read 121
Write 126
Mixed 70
SusWrite 133
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
208% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 73%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D32AESBK.M8FE1 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 43.7
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 42.6
108% 37.8 GB/s
SC Read 28
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 39.6
90% 31.5 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 104%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,874 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,018
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback