Gigabyte GA-Z87-D3HP-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemGigabyte Z87-D3HP
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z87-D3HP-CF  (all builds)
Memory23.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130417
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 13 '20 at 22:31
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 82
1-Core 107
2-Core 202
75% 130 Pts
4-Core 369
8-Core 548
57% 459 Pts
64-Core 567
35% 567 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.5057
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.47% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 5.81
Parallax 6.91
3% 5.34 fps
MRender 8.76
Gravity 2.43
Splatting 6.91
5% 6.04 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.47%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 4 256GB-$400
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 400 402 363 358 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Read 336
Write 373
Mixed 265
SusWrite 367
76% 335 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 40.5
157% 63.6 MB/s
DQ Read 329
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 326
244% 324 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 106%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
79GB free
Firmware: 3B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 156 148 155 167 156 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 389
Write 163
Mixed 162
SusWrite 154
48% 217 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 49.8
4K Mixed 18.7
83% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 288
DQ Write 47.9
DQ Mixed 94.9
88% 143 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 76%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
97GB free
Firmware: 1A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 96 95 95 104 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 106
Write 100
Mixed 97.2
SusWrite 96.9
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 109%
WD Red 6TB (2019)-$129
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 20 71 107 123 130 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
24.4% Poor
Read 7.8
Write 13.7
Mixed 6
SusWrite 77.4
19% 26.2 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
15% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 97%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140
3.5TB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 166 161 171 166 165 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 27
Write 78.8
Mixed 20
SusWrite 165
53% 72.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.2
67% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M1A1600C10 0420 F3-12800CL10-8GBXL 0215 CMZ8GX3M1A1600C10 0420 F3-12800CL10-8GBXL 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.3% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 13.1
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 12.9
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z87-D3HP-CF Builds (Compare 814 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z87-D3HP-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $211
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback