Dell Vostro 270s

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemDell Vostro 270s  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0XFWHV
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 08 '17 at 14:33
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 65%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470S
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
63.6% Good
Memory 80.5
1-Core 89.2
2-Core 177
67% 116 Pts
4-Core 262
8-Core 317
37% 290 Pts
64-Core 346
21% 346 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 600
HP(103C 0835) 1GB
CLim: 640 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 369.26
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.09% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 4.38
Parallax 3.47
3% 3.88 fps
MRender 4.95
Gravity 3.97
Splatting 2.78
3% 3.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.09%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
805GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC44 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 153
Write 142
Mixed 83.8
94% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.23
4K Mixed 0.29
76% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 112%
T- Drive 8GB
7GB free, PID 4127
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
7.49% Terrible
Read 22
Write 11.1
Mixed 8.83
16% 14 MB/s
4K Read 7.88
4K Write 0.004
4K Mixed 0.004
30% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.49%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB Kingston 99U5471-012.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
51.9% Above average
MC Read 19
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.7
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 16.2
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 79.6
50% 79.6 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Vostro 270s Builds (Compare 311 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Vostro 270s

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback