Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics86.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191206
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 28 '20 at 20:47
Run Duration265 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$275
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Memory 70.4
1-Core 160
2-Core 312
95% 181 Pts
4-Core 573
8-Core 1,038
97% 805 Pts
64-Core 1,495
92% 1,495 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 111
Parallax 96.3
89% 106 fps
MRender 97
Gravity 98
Splatting 99.2
80% 98.1 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$49
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PSF100C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 518 299 161 108 108 65 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 892
Write 585
Mixed 606
SusWrite 210
127% 573 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 53.1
192% 74.3 MB/s
DQ Read 274
DQ Write 539
DQ Mixed 319
267% 377 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 126%
Great: 157%
Gigabyte GP-ASM2NE2512GTTDR 512GB
477GB free
Firmware: ECFM12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1561 1221 571 572 571 571 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
232% Outstanding
Read 1,517
Write 1,870
Mixed 1,528
SusWrite 845
325% 1,440 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 63.6
220% 80.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,374
DQ Write 969
DQ Mixed 340
479% 894 MB/s
Poor: 129%
This bench: 232%
Great: 290%
Intel SSDSC2KW010T8 1TB
954GB free
Firmware: LHF0B1C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 407 401 379 375 375 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 400
Mixed 406
SusWrite 388
96% 426 MB/s
4K Read 45.2
4K Write 83
4K Mixed 57.4
186% 61.9 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 155
126% 178 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 111%
Great: 132%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 193 191 194 193 193 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 142
Mixed 88.7
SusWrite 190
109% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 104%
Great: 114%
Seagate STM31000528AS 1TB
494GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 77 80 76 78 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 79.5
Write 66.5
Mixed 59.8
SusWrite 78.2
52% 71 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
173% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 68%
Seagate ST750LM022 HN-M750MBB 750GB
493GB free
Firmware: 0203
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 96 96 96 96 96 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 95.3
Write 60.5
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 95
56% 76.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 57%
Verbatim STORE N GO 64GB
57GB free, PID 0258
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 30 42 43 39 43 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 187
Write 118
Mixed 70
SusWrite 40.1
123% 104 MB/s
4K Read 8.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 1.8
93% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C16-8GTZB F4-3200C16-8GTZSK F4-3200C16-8GTZB F4-3200C16-8GTZSK 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.3% Good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 26.6
68% 24 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 26.4
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,811 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $1,437
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback