Asrock X99 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive200% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X99 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160804
Uptime8.2 Days
Run DateJan 23 '20 at 03:37
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Memory 86.5
1-Core 112
2-Core 225
80% 141 Pts
4-Core 411
8-Core 681
67% 546 Pts
64-Core 871
54% 871 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
MSI(1462 3363) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 137
Reflection 146
Parallax 138
112% 140 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 132
Splatting 108
96% 118 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$117
35GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 323 335 332 336 331 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
90% Excellent
Read 458
Write 447
Mixed 357
SusWrite 329
89% 398 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 84.8
4K Mixed 39.6
142% 51.6 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 151
120% 166 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 90%
Great: 124%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 590 508 489 481 463 429 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
200% Outstanding
Read 2,150
Write 756
Mixed 973
SusWrite 493
240% 1093 MB/s
4K Read 47.2
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 64.1
218% 77.7 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 591
DQ Mixed 207
205% 313 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 200%
Great: 393%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$117
29GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 311 279 250 225 216 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Read 464
Write 439
Mixed 341
SusWrite 266
85% 378 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 81.4
4K Mixed 40.1
141% 50.8 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 249
DQ Mixed 194
162% 234 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 124%
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
152GB free
Firmware: DXT0AB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 243 244 244 244 244 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 418
Write 253
Mixed 158
SusWrite 244
60% 268 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 63.3
4K Mixed 22.4
99% 36.6 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 157
DQ Mixed 35.5
59% 114 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
768GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 128 118 125 124 126 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 140
Write 87.2
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 123
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
96.8% Outstanding
MC Read 35.5
MC Write 43.8
MC Mixed 33.8
108% 37.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 17.6
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 97%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Taichi Builds (Compare 411 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Taichi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 121% - Outstanding Total price: $279
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback