| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 41.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 28.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | HP xw6400 Workstation (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0A04h |
| Memory | 11 GB free of 16.001 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20101025 |
| Uptime | 0.9 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 17 '20 at 13:38 |
| Run Duration | 134 Seconds |
| Run User | BEL-User |
| Background CPU | 19% |
PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5320
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
|
35.5%
Below average
|
29% 39.8 Pts
|
11% 80.1 Pts
|
5% 82.1 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.12.3
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
41.6%
Average
|
39% 58.6 fps
|
47% 57.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 120GB
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE3000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 77 77 62 77 89 MB/s
|
28.7%
Poor
|
17% 76.9 MB/s
|
52% 16.1 MB/s
|
31% 49.9 MB/s
|
|
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 126 128 127 128 127 MB/s
|
70.7%
Very good
|
83% 112 MB/s
|
167% 1.33 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 49GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 33792 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
11.6%
Very poor
|
10% 3.57 GB/s
|
8% 2.77 GB/s
|
30% 135 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical xw6400 Workstation Builds (Compare 50 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP xw6400 Workstation
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| CPU: Intel Xeon E53451stBench 41%, 462 samples | 15x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon 51601stBench 43%, 632 samples | 10x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon 51601stBench 43%, 235 samples | 7x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 6x |
| Quadro FX 4600NvidiaBench 4%, 1,222 samples | 3x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |