MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics33.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemMSI MS-7885
MotherboardMSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160719
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 24 '16 at 06:16
Run Duration99 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel 0000
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 77.3
1-Core 93
2-Core 178
67% 116 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 632
58% 483 Pts
64-Core 1467
91% 1467 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 376.33
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Lighting 42.3
Reflection 33
Parallax 44.4
34% 39.9 fps
MRender 39.1
Gravity 41
Splatting 38.2
32% 39.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 512GB-$66
223GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0801A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Read 512
Write 340
Mixed 349
89% 400 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 58
4K Mixed 23.3
106% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 88.1
DQ Mixed 55
66% 117 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 127%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS4G4D240FSC.8FBD F4-2133C15-4GNT BLS4G4D240FSC.8FBD F4-2133C15-4GNT BLS4G4D240FSC.8FBD F4-2133C15-4GNT BLS4G4D240FSC.8FBD F4-2133C15-4GNT 32GB
2400, 2133, 2400, 2133, 2400, 2133, 2400, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
104% Outstanding
MC Read 41.8
MC Write 39.4
MC Mixed 44.9
120% 42 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 13.3
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 85.7
47% 85.7 ns
Poor: 98%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99A RAIDER (MS-7885) Builds (Compare 889 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $502
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback