To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive132% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 03 '20 at 15:42
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
68.6% Good
Memory 79.2
1-Core 70.9
2-Core 144
59% 98 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 633
56% 473 Pts
64-Core 820
51% 820 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
32.8% Below average
Lighting 41.3
Reflection 30.8
Parallax 36.7
34% 36.2 fps
MRender 38.2
Gravity 40
Splatting 36.4
31% 38.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NE-256 256GB
223GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0620A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 729 571 187 218 204 416 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 1,324
Write 1,115
Mixed 862
SusWrite 387
206% 922 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 71.8
4K Mixed 32.6
130% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 413
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 374
273% 359 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 132%
Great: 234%
Adata XM13 32GB
21GB free
Firmware: 5.0.2d
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 37 35 36 37 35 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 212
Write 41.5
Mixed 66
SusWrite 36
19% 88.9 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 37.6
4K Mixed 23.2
87% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 55.1
DQ Write 38.9
DQ Mixed 43.3
33% 45.8 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 39%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
231GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 112 112 116 117 116 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 102
Write 111
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 115
65% 89.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 103%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 25 26 34 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 13
Write 29.2
Mixed 12
SusWrite 27.4
15% 20.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
30% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0- 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
MC Read 40.8
MC Write 36.9
MC Mixed 36.4
109% 38 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 10.8
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 82
49% 82 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,617 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback