| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor. |
| Graphics | 4.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | ECS MCP61M-M3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 0.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.5 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20101103 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 20 '19 at 14:11 |
| Run Duration | 146 Seconds |
| Run User | PHL-User |
| Background CPU | 96% |
PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
|
27.7%
Poor
|
28% 41.2 Pts
|
8% 63.7 Pts
|
5% 74.2 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Nvidia(10DE 013B) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.41
|
4.62%
Terrible
|
4% 6.2 fps
|
5% 5.86 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hitachi HDS721016CLA 160GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JPEO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 9.1 13 18 16 32 MB/s
|
11.3%
Very poor
|
14% 18.5 MB/s
|
39% 0.17 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
99GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 69 81 48 71 63 MB/s
|
31.7%
Below average
|
37% 50.5 MB/s
|
64% 0.53 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
17%
Very poor
|
18% 6.13 GB/s
|
9% 3.2 GB/s
|
22% 179 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical MCP61M-M3 Builds (Compare 67 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: ECS MCP61M-M3
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)AMDBench 40%, 19,471 samples | 18x |
| Athlon II X4 640AMD $70Bench 45%, 18,839 samples | 8x |
| Phenom II X4 840AMD $150Bench 47%, 5,147 samples | 6x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 11x |
| GeForce 6150SE nForce 430NvidiaBench 0%, 4,836 samples | 9x |
| GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 21% - Poor | Total price: $28 |