MSI P67A-GD53 (MS-7681)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics30.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7681
MotherboardMSI P67A-GD53 (MS-7681)  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110214
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateDec 05 '19 at 17:50
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Memory 92.6
1-Core 120
2-Core 239
85% 150 Pts
4-Core 473
8-Core 475
63% 474 Pts
64-Core 463
29% 463 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Lighting 38.3
Reflection 30.5
Parallax 36.9
31% 35.3 fps
MRender 37.7
Gravity 38
Splatting 36
30% 37.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX100 500GB-$49
232GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 373 216 402 314 321 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 441
Mixed 338
SusWrite 316
90% 401 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 82.4
4K Mixed 40.6
139% 50.5 MB/s
DQ Read 275
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 208
178% 260 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 108%
WD WD1500AHFD-00RAR5 150GB
140GB free
Firmware: 21.07QR5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 7.2 0.5 7.1 6.8 6.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
23.5% Poor
Read 72.5
Write 87.5
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 8.7
39% 53.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
201% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 47%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88
1TB free
Firmware: CC1H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 81 81 81 80 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 109
Write 107
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 80.9
66% 89.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 70%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
230GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 46 46 47 47 46 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
35% Below average
Read 75.5
Write 70.5
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 46.1
44% 59.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 35%
Great: 47%
WD Elements 1TB
931GB free, PID 1042
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 27 28 28 28 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 31.3
Write 24.7
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 27.2
35% 26.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLT8G3D1608DT2TXOB BLT8G3D1608DT2TXOB 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
52.4% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 16.6
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 63
64% 63 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P67A-GD53 (MS-7681) Builds (Compare 147 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI P67A-GD53 (MS-7681)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $546
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback