Asus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 118%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive128% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO  (all builds)
Memory43.1 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190702
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateDec 01 '19 at 12:09
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$191
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Memory 92.5
1-Core 149
2-Core 299
99% 180 Pts
4-Core 557
8-Core 981
93% 769 Pts
64-Core 1,229
76% 1,229 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 431.36
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
126% Outstanding
Lighting 174
Reflection 195
Parallax 174
142% 181 fps
MRender 123
Gravity 175
Splatting 123
114% 141 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 126%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
123GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 483 475 400 414 398 413 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 465
Write 446
Mixed 356
SusWrite 430
96% 424 MB/s
4K Read 45.8
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 64
214% 76.2 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 360
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 128%
Great: 134%
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$139
6GB free
Firmware: 400i
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 428
Write 271
Mixed 274
72% 324 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 49.7
184% 68.9 MB/s
DQ Read 305
DQ Write 251
DQ Mixed 222
181% 259 MB/s
Poor: 58% Great: 95%
Intel X25-M 40GB
19GB free
Firmware: 2CV102M3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 41 39 42 42 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 192
Write 42.5
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 41.5
19% 85.8 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 41.6
4K Mixed 10.9
68% 24.4 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 42
DQ Mixed 65.9
55% 83.3 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 36%
Intel X25-M 40GB
10GB free
Firmware: 2CV102M3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 42 38 42 42 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
34.2% Below average
Read 190
Write 42.2
Mixed 68.2
SusWrite 41.5
19% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 41.6
4K Mixed 11.5
68% 24.7 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 42.2
DQ Mixed 67
56% 84 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 36%
Intel X25-M 40GB
11GB free
Firmware: 2CV102M3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 42 37 42 41 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
34.2% Below average
Read 192
Write 42
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 41
19% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 41.3
4K Mixed 11.3
68% 24.6 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 41.4
DQ Mixed 66.4
56% 83.5 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 36%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
4GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 5.9 5.5 5.6 5.8 5.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
5.73% Terrible
Read 20
Write 5.3
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 5.6
10% 8.9 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
25% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.73%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSA.M16FAD Kingston KHX2400C15/16G BLS8G4D240FSA.M16FAD Kingston KHX2400C15/16G 48GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81% Excellent
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 30.5
MC Mixed 25.2
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 33.4
SC Mixed 26
75% 26.2 GB/s
Latency 63.1
63% 63.1 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 81%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG MAXIMUS X HERO Builds (Compare 3,693 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $1,145
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback