TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Z400 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics9.43% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z400 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B4Ch
Memory7.1 GB free of 10.002 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110610
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 30 '19 at 18:02
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W3550
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 92.3
1-Core 80.6
2-Core 160
67% 111 Pts
4-Core 262
8-Core 400
41% 331 Pts
64-Core 400
25% 400 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑
This bench: 70.2%
 Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI FirePro V5800 (FireGL) Graphics Adapter
Device(13CC 3D20) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
9.43% Terrible
Lighting 12.5
Reflection 9.35
Parallax 10.6
10% 10.8 fps
MRender 8.81
Gravity 9.3
Splatting 10.7
8% 9.62 fps
Poor: 8% ↑
This bench: 9.43%
 Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
80GB free
Firmware: JP2OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 134 135 131 134 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Read 137
Write 138
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 133
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑
This bench: 77.6%
 Great: 74%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
345GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CA12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 49 78 92 99 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 95
Write 93.3
Mixed 52
SusWrite 75.5
58% 78.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑
This bench: 48.9%
 Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G6M1 44GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 2048, 34816 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
32.2% Below average
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 9.2
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 8.7
26% 9.03 GB/s
Latency 63.6
63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 18% ↑
This bench: 32.2%
 Great: 32%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Z400 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,344 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z400 Workstation

CPU
Xeon W3520Intel  $230Bench 63%, 6,508 samples570x
Xeon W3550IntelBench 66%, 7,649 samples539x
Xeon W3565IntelBench 67%, 7,121 samples491x
GPU
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples275x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples157x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples138x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples136x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples74x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples66x
RAM
ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 42GBUnknownBench 37%, 128 samples22x
ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 46GBUnknownBench 45%, 108 samples18x
ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 46GBUnknownBench 46%, 280 samples16x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $258
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback