Asrock 990FX Extreme3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics58.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 990FX Extreme3  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150804
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 30 '19 at 12:13
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 29%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4100-$110
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Memory 77.5
1-Core 63.8
2-Core 103
52% 81.5 Pts
4-Core 189
8-Core 181
25% 185 Pts
64-Core 175
11% 175 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
58.5% Above average
Lighting 73.7
Reflection 66.7
Parallax 70.9
60% 70.4 fps
MRender 69.3
Gravity 67
Splatting 67.6
56% 68 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 144 107 96 92 98 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.4% Average
Read 270
Write 147
Mixed 232
SusWrite 110
42% 190 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 41.5
4K Mixed 19
75% 26.6 MB/s
DQ Read 27.3
DQ Write 54.3
DQ Mixed 28.2
25% 36.6 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1TB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 142 146 147 145 141 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
73.5% Very good
Read 118
Write 74.7
Mixed 40
SusWrite 138
67% 92.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.3
126% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 114%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
626GB free, PID 231a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 118 118 119 118 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 89
Write 114
Mixed 45.2
SusWrite 117
126% 91.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
69% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 50%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 2GB
2GB free, PID 070e
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 2 2.1 1.8 1.7 1.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
1.14% Terrible
Read 5
Write 1.7
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 1.9
3% 2.77 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.14%
Great: 7%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 8GB
7GB free, PID 070e
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.3 0.2 1.6 1.7 2.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
3.05% Terrible
Read 14.2
Write 7.3
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 1.1
8% 7.08 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.05%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Hynix HMT41GU7AFR8A-H9 Hynix HMT41GU7AFR8A-H9 32GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.5% Below average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 14
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 11.6
26% 9.23 GB/s
Latency 85.3
47% 85.3 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 990FX Extreme3 Builds (Compare 302 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Extreme3 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $782
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback