Lenovo 11361N9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics33.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 11361N9  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190920
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '19 at 01:31
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Memory 51.6
1-Core 71.9
2-Core 132
48% 85.3 Pts
4-Core 267
8-Core 533
47% 400 Pts
64-Core 1,014
63% 1,014 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000
Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.28
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Lighting 40.1
Reflection 40
Parallax 36.4
33% 38.8 fps
MRender 50.2
Gravity 36.7
Splatting 39.1
34% 42 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66
908GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 580 310 286 166 415 316 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 75% Great: 125%
Intel 520 Series 180GB-$132
164GB free
Firmware: LF1i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 196 196 197 201 202 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Read 318
Write 218
Mixed 241
SusWrite 194
54% 243 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 71.4
4K Mixed 37.3
135% 47.2 MB/s
DQ Read 286
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 221
175% 244 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391B5773DH0- 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 53.8
MC Write 39
MC Mixed 46
132% 46.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 5
17% 5.87 GB/s
Latency 155
26% 155 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 109%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback