Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 2GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	HP Compaq dc7800 Convertible Minitower (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0AACh
Memory	0.7 GB free of 2.00391 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090226
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 30 '16 at 14:02
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E6850-$57 4,150 User benchmarks, average bench 40% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	39.8% Below average	Memory 69.1 1-Core 34.4 2-Core 56.9 37% 53.5 Pts	4-Core 65.3 8-Core 62.1 9% 63.7 Pts	64-Core 65.1 4% 65.1 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 45%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$46 33,785 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.CHF Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	31.8% Below average	Read 57 Write 53.7 Mixed 52.8 41% 54.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 1.14 4K Mixed 0.33 86% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 42%
Corsair Force LE SSD 240GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 91GB free, PID 0621 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	35.4% Below average	Read 33.1 Write 26.2 Mixed 29.3 37% 29.5 MB/s	4K Read 7.77 4K Write 7.51 4K Mixed 4.93 452% 6.74 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 154%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 38GB 3,056 User benchmarks, average bench 16% null MHz 1024, 1024, 36864 MB Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	14.7% Very poor	MC Read 4.9 MC Write 5 MC Mixed 3.7 13% 4.53 GB/s	SC Read 3.8 SC Write 3.8 SC Mixed 2.7 10% 3.43 GB/s	Latency 104 39% 104 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 21%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	16x
Core2 Duo E6550Intel $20Bench 37%, 11,349 samples	8x
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	6x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	6x
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	5x
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	5x

Value: 34% - Below average

Total price: $200

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16