PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 29.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 45.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus M4A87TD/USB3 (all builds) |
Memory | 1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 2560x1080x4294967296 szín |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20100824 |
Uptime | 6.7 Days |
Run Date | Oct 19 '19 at 12:31 |
Run Duration | 161 Seconds |
Run User | HUN-User |
Background CPU | 77% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
51%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 378E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.48
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.9%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 541ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 97 106 119 104 112 MB/s
|
45.5%
Average
|
|||
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$55
270GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 15 2.5 2.5 17 22 MB/s
|
16.5%
Very poor
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
74GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 22 26 22 23 26 MB/s
|
19.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingmax FLGF65F-C8KJB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM 800 MHz
|
30.9%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples | 41x |
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples | 24x |
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples | 22x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 6850AMDBench 12%, 31,600 samples | 8x |
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples | 6x |
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples | 6x |
SSD | |
---|---|
BX500 120GBCrucial $15Bench 55%, 37,154 samples | 7x |
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples | 5x |
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 63% - Good | Total price: $98 |