HP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.94% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1998
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190417
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateOct 12 '19 at 14:45
Run Duration106 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
60.3% Good
Memory 79.6
1-Core 103
2-Core 177
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 339
35% 281 Pts
64-Core 380
24% 380 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.48
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
6.94% Terrible
Lighting 8.87
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 3.75
7% 5.71 fps
MRender 10.7
Gravity 7
Splatting 6.43
6% 8.05 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.94%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
442GB free (System drive)
Firmware: A8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 84 97 96 94 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 79.2
Write 85.8
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 92.2
51% 70.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 8GB
1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
25.1% Poor
MC Read 8.2
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 7.3
23% 7.97 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 7.9
21% 7.27 GB/s
Latency 81.2
49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF Builds (Compare 6,375 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback