Asus X450VB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus X450VB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X450VB
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit 色彩,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131015
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 08 '16 at 13:27
Run Duration96 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.2% Good
Memory 91.7
1-Core 84.3
2-Core 149
67% 108 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 202
27% 204 Pts
64-Core 196
12% 196 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Asus(1043 126D) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.63% Terrible
Lighting 4.03
Reflection 7.85
Parallax 2.75
3% 4.88 fps
MRender 5.05
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 7.57
4% 4.95 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.63%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.22 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Read 200
Write 116
Mixed 142
34% 152 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 54.4
4K Mixed 8.27
70% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 21.7
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 7.95
27% 55.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6EFR8A-PB Elpida 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
53.3% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 17.3
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 14.2
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback