Asrock Z87 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics55.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Z87 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130703
Uptime24.8 Days
Run DateNov 06 '16 at 11:14
Run Duration314 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 83.7
1-Core 102
2-Core 201
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 393
8-Core 396
53% 395 Pts
64-Core 396
24% 396 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 21.19.137.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Lighting 69.2
Reflection 62.3
Parallax 79.2
56% 70.3 fps
MRender 60.9
Gravity 55
Splatting 77.7
54% 64.5 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$226
414GB free
Firmware: X41100RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 472
Write 331
Mixed 282
80% 362 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 31.6
4K Mixed 7.43
58% 20.1 MB/s
DQ Read 23.3
DQ Write 34.1
DQ Mixed 8.28
12% 21.9 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 107%
Winkom Pro ML-240 240GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.0.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 356
Write 218
Mixed 170
55% 248 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 55.7
4K Mixed 10.9
77% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 20.9
DQ Write 57.8
DQ Mixed 10.6
16% 29.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 85%
WD WD30EURS-63SPKY0 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 104
Write 104
Mixed 109
80% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.79
4K Write 1.64
4K Mixed 0.23
89% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 82%
WD WD30EURS-63SPKY0 3TB
312GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
60% Above average
Read 113
Write 96.1
Mixed 94.4
76% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.68
4K Mixed 0.19
71% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 60%
Great: 82%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
176GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
37% Below average
Read 68.8
Write 59.8
Mixed 61.8
48% 63.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.91
4K Mixed 0.32
93% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37%
Great: 57%
WD WD30EURS-63SPKY0 3TB
55GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
66% Good
Read 119
Write 111
Mixed 112
86% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.71
4K Mixed 0.17
69% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 66%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Team-Elite-1600 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.6% Below average
MC Read 11
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 9
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 10.5
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z87 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 929 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock Z87 Extreme4 - $224

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $441
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback