bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory14.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1904 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20160405
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 11 '19 at 09:25
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2640 0
CPU #000, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
62.8% Good
Memory 75.9
1-Core 29.6
2-Core 147
49% 84.1 Pts
4-Core 287
8-Core 294
39% 290 Pts
64-Core 289
18% 289 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 63%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 215GB
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 70 80 79 76 72 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 79.5
Write 80.9
Mixed 93.5
SusWrite 76.4
62% 82.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 4.7
730% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 128 slots used
16GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
76.6% Very good
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 33.8
MC Mixed 29
90% 31.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 5.5
17% 5.83 GB/s
Latency 88.4
45% 88.4 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,289 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback