Dell OptiPlex 740

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell OptiPlex 740
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 740  (all builds)
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070608
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 03 '19 at 19:56
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+
Socket M2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Memory 63.7
1-Core 24.3
2-Core 39.4
31% 42.5 Pts
4-Core 44.8
8-Core 44.2
6% 44.5 Pts
64-Core 57.6
4% 57.6 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI FirePro V3800 (FireGL)
HP(103C 210A) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.911.3.4000
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
2.93% Terrible
Lighting 3.73
Reflection 5.27
Parallax 4.81
3% 4.61 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 3.93
Splatting 3.7
3% 3.24 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.93%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$22
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 19 36 38 24 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 21.8
Write 21
Mixed 22.9
SusWrite 25.6
17% 22.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
69% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4GB
null MHz
2048, 1024, 1024 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.1% Very poor
MC Read 3.6
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 3.6
11% 3.73 GB/s
SC Read 1.7
SC Write 2.3
SC Mixed 3.1
7% 2.37 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 740 Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 740

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 8% - Terrible Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback