Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	164% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF X299 MARK 1 (all builds)
Memory	59.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190214
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 03 '19 at 14:43
Run Duration	193 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7820X-$375 28,524 User benchmarks, average bench 80% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	94.8% Outstanding	Memory 82.5 1-Core 138 2-Core 286 91% 169 Pts	4-Core 573 8-Core 1,108 100% 841 Pts	64-Core 1,586 98% 1,586 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 94.8% Great: 92%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Asus(1043 85E8) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2138 MHz, MLim: 2852 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.60 Performing below potential (42^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	101% Outstanding	Lighting 144 Reflection 166 Parallax 136 117% 149 fps	MRender 128 Gravity 0.27 Splatting 122 71% 83.4 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 110%
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Asus(1043 866A) CLim: 2325 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 431.60 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	164% Outstanding	Lighting 223 Reflection 249 Parallax 246 182% 239 fps	MRender 273 Gravity 246 Splatting 151 175% 223 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 164% Great: 174%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 EVO 250GB 612 User benchmarks, average bench 277% 239GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 2,180 Write 1,928 Mixed 1,376 406% 1,828 MB/s	4K Read 59.1 4K Write 206 4K Mixed 89.7 314% 118 MB/s	DQ Read 1426 DQ Write 1,211 DQ Mixed 1,277 968% 1,305 MB/s
Poor: 208% Great: 332%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$58 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 139 Write 138 Mixed 98.7 93% 125 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 84%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 224GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 76.5 Write 74.1 Mixed 38.6 47% 63.1 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.6 118% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 84%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1.5TB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 85.8 Write 83.3 Mixed 51.1 54% 73.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 135% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 67%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$58 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 1TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 95.2 Write 92.1 Mixed 68 64% 85.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 184% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 84%
WD WD20NPVX-00EA4T0 2TB 852 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 94.2 Write 60.9 Mixed 27.4 44% 60.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.3 57% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 8x8GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 116% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	99.9% Outstanding	MC Read 32 MC Write 54.4 MC Mixed 32.6 113% 39.7 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 22.6 SC Mixed 11 40% 14 GB/s	Latency 76 53% 76 ns
Poor: 100% ↑ This bench: 99.9% Great: 145%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X299 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 704 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 103%

UFO

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 104%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

CPU
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	182x
Core i7-7800XIntel $206Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	137x
Core i9-7900XIntel $349Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	122x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	82x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	69x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	39x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	37x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	31x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	26x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	40x
Dominator DDR4 2800 C16 8x4GBCorsairBench 113%, 223 samples	19x
F4 DDR4 4000 C15 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 115%, 708 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $1,132

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16