MSI 990FXA-GD65 (MS-7640)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7640
MotherboardMSI 990FXA-GD65 (MS-7640)  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150601
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 28 '19 at 12:03
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 945
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
60.9% Good
Memory 92
1-Core 49.6
2-Core 99.4
53% 80.3 Pts
4-Core 176
8-Core 177
24% 177 Pts
64-Core 184
11% 184 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Palit(1569 1381) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 431.36
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Lighting 19.1
Reflection 15.4
Parallax 17.2
16% 17.3 fps
MRender 23.2
Gravity 18.5
Splatting 16.3
16% 19.3 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AMD 2+0 Stripe/RAID0 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 260 269 250 261 269 263 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 330
Write 338
Mixed 152
SusWrite 262
61% 271 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 12
4K Mixed 1.3
16% 6.3 MB/s
DQ Read 12.5
DQ Write 12.3
DQ Mixed 6.3
6% 10.4 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 123%
Seagate ST3160811AS 160GB
28GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 68 68 67 68 69 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 67.3
Write 36
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 67.4
39% 53.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
149% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 39%
Seagate ST3250410AS 250GB
275GB free
Firmware: 3.AAF
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 153 153 154 153 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Read 140
Write 146
Mixed 66.8
SusWrite 150
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 54%
Generic USB SD Reader 32GB
8GB free, PID 6362
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4.5 4.5 4.5 3.2 3.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
6.03% Terrible
Read 4.3
Write 4.3
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 4.1
6% 4.25 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 2
120% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 6.03%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.9% Below average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 13.1
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 9.7
23% 8.1 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 990FXA-GD65 (MS-7640) Builds (Compare 179 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI 990FXA-GD65 (MS-7640) - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $636
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback