HP Z600 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B54h
Memory18.5 GB free of 32.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130715
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateJul 26 '19 at 19:35
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5670
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
62.5% Good
Memory 65.8
1-Core 81.4
2-Core 162
59% 103 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 623
56% 470 Pts
64-Core 842
52% 842 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 75%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA7D0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 97 80 85 89 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 122
Write 117
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 90.9
65% 89.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
114% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 103%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB
124GB free
Firmware: MJ8OA5F0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 75 64 51 42 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 100
Write 110
Mixed 54.3
SusWrite 58.1
59% 80.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 89%
Hitachi HDS723030ALA 3TB
33GB free
Firmware: MKAO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 26 26 25 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Read 29.2
Write 24.5
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 25.5
19% 26.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:00 00 ID:00 00 ID:00 00 ID:00 00 66GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 34816 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
47% Average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 19.5
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 6.5
17% 5.8 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 47%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z600 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,168 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: HP Z600 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback