Asrock A88M-ITX/ac

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock A88M-ITX/ac  (all builds)
Memory7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160120
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 15 '16 at 11:15
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka)
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Memory 73.2
1-Core 68
2-Core 116
53% 85.7 Pts
4-Core 213
8-Core 214
29% 214 Pts
64-Core 212
13% 212 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
ASRock(1849 1313) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1065.0
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
4.5% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 6.81
Parallax 9.53
4% 7.28 fps
MRender 3.52
Gravity 7.23
Splatting 5.65
4% 5.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.5%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
301GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CR100-10 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
43% Average
Read 72.2
Write 77.4
Mixed 43
48% 64.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 1.29
4K Mixed 0.22
76% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 43%
Great: 44%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$78
12GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Read 51.8
Write 48
Mixed 34.5
33% 44.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.65
4K Mixed 0.28
82% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR3-1600 CL11 4GB DDR3-1600 CL11 8GB 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
36.5% Below average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 14.2
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 9.4
25% 8.7 GB/s
Latency 94.2
42% 94.2 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A88M-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock A88M-ITX/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 33% - Below average Total price: $329
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback