Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	51.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3610QM-$300 38,575 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	65.4% Good	Memory 83 1-Core 83.9 2-Core 155 64% 107 Pts	4-Core 259 8-Core 418 42% 338 Pts	64-Core 419 26% 419 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 71%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109 51,792 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT0AB0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 67 64 59 58 54 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	51.8% Above average	Read 407 Write 85.7 Mixed 104 SusWrite 62.2 36% 165 MB/s	4K Read 19.9 4K Write 44.6 4K Mixed 16.5 75% 27 MB/s	DQ Read 331 DQ Write 84.8 DQ Mixed 49.6 78% 155 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 73%
HGST Travelstar 7K750 2.5" 750GB-$77 8,773 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 511GB free Firmware: JF4OA200 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 94 94 94 94 94 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	50.5% Above average	Read 82.5 Write 71 Mixed 50 SusWrite 93.4 54% 74.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 50.5% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT102464BF160B.C16 859B CT102464BF160B.M16 859B CT102464BF160B.C16 859B CT102464BF160B.M16 32GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	54.3% Above average	MC Read 20.8 MC Write 19.3 MC Mixed 16.7 54% 18.9 GB/s	SC Read 16.5 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 17 46% 16.1 GB/s	Latency 75.1 53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

GPU
GTX 660MNvidiaBench 7%, 7,381 samples	342x
GTX 670MNvidiaBench 10%, 2,951 samples	276x
GeForce GTX 770NvidiaBench 9%, 2 samples	1x

SSD
LAT-256M3S 256GBLiteonitBench 75%, 575 samples	30x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	17x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	14x

RAM
EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 2x4GBElpidaBench 48%, 3,420 samples	66x
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 53%, 1,421 samples	61x
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 25,458 samples	48x

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $300

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16