To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive0.46% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (78%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101228
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 14 '19 at 22:22
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 78%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom D525-$250
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
24% Poor
Memory 44.8
1-Core 7.2
2-Core 13.8
18% 21.9 Pts
4-Core 20
8-Core 25.2
3% 22.6 Pts
64-Core 23
1% 23 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 24%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Wintec v2 30GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.14A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 4.2 4.6 1.7 1.8 7.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
0.46% Terrible
Read 5.5
Write 3
Mixed 2.8
SusWrite 4
1% 3.83 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.46%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4GB
800, 800 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11% Very poor
MC Read 4.4
MC Write 3.2
MC Mixed 3.5
11% 3.7 GB/s
SC Read 1.5
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 2.3
6% 2.07 GB/s
Latency 181
22% 181 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,620 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback