HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics1.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory3.3 GB free of 6.00195 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111102
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 04 '15 at 01:48
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5647
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 65.9
2-Core 133
45% 99.6 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 447
42% 347 Pts
64-Core 442
27% 442 Pts
Poor: 57% Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3600
PwrHis(1787 3000) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.945.0.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.33% Terrible
Lighting 1.57
Reflection 3.23
Parallax 1.16
1% 1.98 fps
MRender 1.81
Gravity 0.63
Splatting 2.48
1% 1.64 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.33%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
system 120GB
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46% Average
Read 382
Write 80.6
Mixed 157
45% 207 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 57.3
4K Mixed 11.8
67% 27.9 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 93.9
DQ Mixed 39.1
55% 103 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46%
Great: 61%
depo 750GB
678GB free
Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: Unknown
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.9% Very poor
Read 8.83
Write 56.8
Mixed 17.8
21% 27.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.12
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.37
76% 0.7 MB/s
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB
145GB free, PID 61b6
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 32.7
Write 28.5
Mixed 29
38% 30.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.29
59% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 42%
Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,952 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback