MSI H110M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7A15)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	22.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	MSI MS-7A15
Motherboard	MSI H110M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7A15) (all builds)
Memory	5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20180319
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 11 '19 at 12:44
Run Duration	166 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G4600-$27 16,729 User benchmarks, average bench 63% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	73% Very good	Memory 92.4 1-Core 115 2-Core 209 80% 139 Pts	4-Core 310 8-Core 319 42% 315 Pts	64-Core 313 19% 313 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B 49,289 User benchmarks, average bench 20% PwrHis(1787 A56D) 2GB CLim: 1196 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.5.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	22.8% Poor	Lighting 27.2 Reflection 31 Parallax 32 22% 30.1 fps	MRender 29.1 Gravity 26.3 Splatting 32 24% 29.1 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 22.8% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ccboot iSCSI 107GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 8,563 Write 8,318 Mixed 8089 1,860% 8,323 MB/s	4K Read 424 4K Write 411 4K Mixed 417 1,394% 417 MB/s	DQ Read 484 DQ Write 516 DQ Mixed 483 368% 494 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 80%
52netbar iShareDisk 524GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 72GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 5.3 4.6 5.1 4.9 5.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	4.39% Terrible	Read 9.5 Write 6.5 Mixed 4.7 SusWrite 5 5% 6.43 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1.3 209% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.39% Great: 36%
52netbar iShareDisk 377GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 34GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 5.2 4.6 5 5 5.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	5.11% Terrible	Read 10.2 Write 8.5 Mixed 6.7 SusWrite 5 6% 7.6 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 4 4K Mixed 3.7 652% 3.9 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.11% Great: 36%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 78.B1GMS.C7W0B 2x4GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	78.8% Very good	MC Read 27.9 MC Write 31.6 MC Mixed 23.8 79% 27.8 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 31.5 SC Mixed 23.5 69% 24.2 GB/s	Latency 63.3 63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 78.8% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7A15) Builds (Compare 2,738 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI H110M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7A15)

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $90Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	723x
Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	420x
Pentium G4560Intel $31Bench 57%, 70,054 samples	300x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	411x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	317x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	186x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	222x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	129x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	116x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	52x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	52x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	44x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $177

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16