HP Pavilion dm1 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion dm1 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 148B
Memory1.4 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100608
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 22 '19 at 23:02
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II Neo K325 Dual-Core
Socket S1G4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Memory 60.3
1-Core 18.9
2-Core 39.4
29% 39.5 Pts
4-Core 34.7
8-Core 38.6
5% 36.7 Pts
64-Core 37.9
2% 37.9 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 34%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250
HP(103C 148B) 256MB
Driver: atiumd64.dll Ver. 8.632.1.2000
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.37% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 0.77
Parallax 0.34
0% 0.5 fps
MRender 0.57
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.78
0% 0.52 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.37%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qumo SSD 60GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O061
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 67 68 68 64 70 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.6% Below average
Read 353
Write 70.5
Mixed 116
SusWrite 67.3
33% 152 MB/s
4K Read 10.6
4K Write 17.6
4K Mixed 11.9
41% 13.4 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 71
DQ Mixed 84.4
69% 99.6 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 48%
General UDisk 1GB
1GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 7.4 8.2 8.4 8 6.6 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
5.38% Terrible
Read 18
Write 6.3
Mixed 6.8
SusWrite 7.5
11% 9.65 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
20% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.38%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B2873EH1-CF8 M471B5673FH0-CH9 3GB
800, 800 MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.3% Very poor
MC Read 5.5
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 4.9
13% 4.6 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 3.4
10% 3.33 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion dm1 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion dm1 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback