Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	63.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	72.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140407
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 09 '16 at 22:26
Run Duration	237 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8320E-$87 33,199 User benchmarks, average bench 58% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	69.7% Good	Memory 93.2 1-Core 77 2-Core 148 65% 106 Pts	4-Core 251 8-Core 470 43% 360 Pts	64-Core 476 29% 476 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB; GV-N1060G1GAMING-6GD Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7270 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	63.9% Good	Lighting 80.2 Reflection 80.8 Parallax 68.7 65% 76.5 fps	MRender 71.6 Gravity 75.4 Splatting 75.8 61% 74.3 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 480GB-$300 13,412 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 266GB free Firmware: SAFZ Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 200 200 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1 (C2) HDA temperature 69 62 163210395679 (F1) Unknown 100 100 5945	68.5% Good	Read 507 Write 324 Mixed 341 86% 391 MB/s	4K Read 26 4K Write 44.1 4K Mixed 9.64 75% 26.6 MB/s	DQ Read 184 DQ Write 132 DQ Mixed 41.8 63% 120 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 101%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 30GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5681 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 952 (B1) Unknown 95 95 52 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 60 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 80 (F1) Unknown 99 99 14248392775	72.4% Very good	Read 429 Write 327 Mixed 327 80% 361 MB/s	4K Read 33.9 4K Write 41.7 4K Mixed 18.2 97% 31.3 MB/s	DQ Read 183 DQ Write 121 DQ Mixed 42 61% 115 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 296GB free Firmware: JC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 113 99 56652178 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2780 (05) Reallocated sector count 53 53 1942 (07) Seek error rate 81 60 13339935723 (09) Power-on hours count 79 79 18879 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2241 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 98 81605623841 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 61 504889373 (C2) HDA temperature 29 40 60129542173 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 51 24 56652178 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 139663746556150 (F1) Unknown 100 253 71771465 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3829588080	55.1% Above average	Read 112 Write 80.2 Mixed 60 62% 84 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.05 4K Mixed 0.46 95% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 68%
Initio Ini-3910 500GB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 186GB free, PID 3910 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	15.7% Very poor	Read 29 Write 27.4 Mixed 21.7 33% 26 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.76 4K Mixed 0.22 69% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 73%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 128GB 752 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 29GB free, PID fa05 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	58.6% Above average	Read 187 Write 135 Mixed 89.6 162% 137 MB/s	4K Read 5.6 4K Write 0.21 4K Mixed 0.15 33% 1.99 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB 122,541 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	52.9% Above average	MC Read 22.2 MC Write 16.2 MC Mixed 18.7 54% 19 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 12.8 31% 10.9 GB/s	Latency 61.6 65% 61.6 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,064 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	564x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	138x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	80x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	67x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	62x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	59x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	41x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	40x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	33x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	37x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	24x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $610

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16