| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 24.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Supermicro H8DCE (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Supermicro H8DCE |
| Memory | 4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20081028 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 14 '19 at 11:57 |
| Run Duration | 131 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 64% |
PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: AMD Opteron 252
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
|
37.6%
Below average
|
38% 59.2 Pts
|
10% 75.2 Pts
|
4% 72 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 580-$450
Zotac(19DA 1203) 1.5GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 391.35
|
24.3%
Poor
|
23% 27.6 fps
|
26% 32.8 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hitachi HDS721616PLA380 165GB-$46
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P22OAB3A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 14 11 15 18 15 MB/s
|
16.9%
Very poor
|
19% 24.9 MB/s
|
74% 0.5 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 8x1GB
8 of 8 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR
|
15.3%
Very poor
|
14% 4.8 GB/s
|
12% 4.23 GB/s
|
34% 119 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds