Asus P5Q-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P5Q-PRO (all builds)
Memory	0.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090223
Uptime	5.3 Days
Run Date	Mar 27 '19 at 14:49
Run Duration	441 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$89 68,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% LGA 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	41.9% Average	Memory 70.5 1-Core 41.8 2-Core 83.3 42% 65.2 Pts	4-Core 79.9 8-Core 79.4 11% 79.7 Pts	64-Core 80.5 5% 80.5 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Nvidia(10DE 128B) 1GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 398.36 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.72% Terrible	Lighting 4.37 Reflection 4.35 Parallax 4.16 4% 4.29 fps	MRender 4.14 Gravity 3.87 Splatting 6.17 4% 4.73 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.72% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03070009 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 52 48 33 46 55 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	38.4% Below average	Read 183 Write 74.1 Mixed 94 SusWrite 50.8 22% 101 MB/s	4K Read 23.7 4K Write 33.8 4K Mixed 19 78% 25.5 MB/s	DQ Read 144 DQ Write 50.7 DQ Mixed 65.2 57% 86.6 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 85%
Kingston DataTraveler R3.0 G2 USB 3.0 32GB-$30 1,204 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 2GB free, PID 16a2 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 11 17 24 8.1 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	9.98% Terrible	Read 32.9 Write 21.7 Mixed 12.2 SusWrite 14.8 25% 20.4 MB/s	4K Read 7.1 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.6 50% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.98% Great: 42%
SMI USB DISK 32GB 2,299 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 21GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.4 8.6 10 10 10 9.7 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	5.58% Terrible	Read 19 Write 1.7 Mixed 6.7 SusWrite 9.3 10% 9.18 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 13% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.58% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x1GB 54,972 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 4 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	19.1% Very poor	MC Read 6.7 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 6.1 18% 6.37 GB/s	SC Read 3.8 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 2.3 11% 3.77 GB/s	Latency 100 40% 100 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 28%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5Q-PRO Builds (Compare 363 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5Q-PRO

CPU
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	79x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	32x
Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples	28x

GPU
HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples	26x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	13x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	12x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	14x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	10x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	10x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	198x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	60x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $189

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16