Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 304Ah
Memory6.1 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110714
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '19 at 00:47
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 760-$100
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 94
1-Core 82.5
2-Core 155
68% 110 Pts
4-Core 281
8-Core 291
38% 286 Pts
64-Core 233
14% 233 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 418.91
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.74% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 4.38
Parallax 4.19
4% 4.32 fps
MRender 4.19
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 6.17
4% 4.75 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.74%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
319GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 69 89 93 99 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 98.5
Write 96.2
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 89.2
62% 84.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 88%
WD Black 750GB (2008)-$160
443GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 98 100 100 100 101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 107
Write 96.6
Mixed 60.4
SusWrite 99.9
67% 90.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:01 98 9905471-022.A00LF ID:01 98 9905471-014.A00LF 44GB
1333, 1333, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 36864 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
43% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 13.2
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 11.7
34% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 59.8
67% 59.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 43%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC Builds (Compare 787 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $95
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $238Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback